Interesting thread about the rated league play topic.

Moderators: THRO2NV, RickyBenny

Interesting thread about the rated league play topic.

Postby Jadams » Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:02 pm

Jadams
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Waterloo, IA

Postby CalebP » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:48 am

Im 100% for it...if we're able to keep our liberties. Tracking looks fairly easy. The only thing I would hesitate on.... is to wait it out to let them work out the kinks.
User avatar
CalebP
Site Admin
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 1:26 pm
Location: Cedar Falls, IA

Postby Jadams » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:16 pm

Yeah. I also saw that the max rated season is 12 weeks.
Jadams
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Waterloo, IA

Postby CalebP » Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:10 am

It shouldnt affect how we play our league normally. We could just report raw scores for the 12 weeks and and youd only be rated for that period of time. Otherwise standard operations.
User avatar
CalebP
Site Admin
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 1:26 pm
Location: Cedar Falls, IA

Postby Jadams » Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:42 pm

Yeah. That's what I figured. Would rounds at tourist count towards it?
Jadams
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Waterloo, IA

Postby Master Lee » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:36 am

Might be best to start the ratings after the first Handicap nights. Basically, have the last 12 weeks rated. This would take sandbagging out of the equation, as well as giving everyone a few weeks to decide if they would like to participate. Just a thought
User avatar
Master Lee
 
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:56 pm

Postby kinch » Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:52 am

How do you rate a course like Tourist? A perfect 36 may only be a 980 round??
I like the idea of rating league rounds, but it is much different playing a course during a tournament vs. a league night.

I agree that if we only get 12 weeks, we should use the last 12, or better yet, why not skip rounds played at Tourist?
User avatar
kinch
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:28 pm

Postby GDL17921 » Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:57 pm

sounds like a question for Chuck Kennedy
User avatar
GDL17921
 
Posts: 8537
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:57 am
Location: on a rock

Postby Steady 26542 » Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:34 pm

Well, as I understand it, if you have (10) 1000 rated players and they all shoot 36 then there is a good likelihood that a 36 would get rated at around 1000. If that same group of 1000 rated players shoot 50 except for one of them and that person shoots a 36 (14 better than the rest) then that round would be rated very high, probably over 1100. So it really depends on what the other rated players shoot. Chuck, chime in on this.
Team Iron Lion
Team MILLENNIUM
Team Gorilla Boy
Image
"Frisbees are a hobby; disc golf is a sport."
User avatar
Steady 26542
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Davenport, IA

rating league

Postby kinch » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:26 am

I'm not sure if I would even want CF scores to count towards my rating. The only tournaments on that course in the last 10 years are 'Snow Disc'. We have singles scores for league that could be compiled but I do not believe that has been done. Jason Steffen may want to wiegh in on this, he is the most current 'local' on ratings issues. Deerwood course has 1 rated round (2003) other than league.

From the comments I've read, we can submit scratch scores and still use our hcp. system as is. I believe we have 10 or more currently rated players in league on a weekly basis. Are the remainder of league members going to be interested in more stats? I'm not so sure, we don't get many league members at our own tournaments as it is. I like the concept, just not sure it will work for us.

#3989
User avatar
kinch
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:28 pm

Postby Master Lee » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:01 am

I agree, Tourist should not be part of the new rating system. I also agree with the fact that most discers in this area do not take league nights as seriously as tournaments. For me personally, the ratings would more heavily reflect my league performance since I don't make it to very many Tournaments any more. I believe that it should be an option we offer, if the statistician doesn't mind a little extra work on his part. Any players who want to participate would be solely responsible for the additional fee. Those who opt out, will not have to pay any extra. Caleb's Tournament was sanctioned last year, so Deerwood should have a course rating.
User avatar
Master Lee
 
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:56 pm

Postby RickyBenny » Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:20 pm

i agree with lee
User avatar
RickyBenny
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:06 am
Location: Waterloo


Return to Black Hawk Metro Disc Golf League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron